Studies show that the average American consumer trusts advice given by their doctor or hospital when it comes to medical devices and implants. However, both doctors and hospitals are influenced by marketing from medical device companies, which too often includes false claims or flawed information. In fact, serious health risks associated with medical devices are typically not revealed until the FDA has recorded a trend in adverse event reporting. Many medical companies view the fines and damages they may pay as a result of false advertising or medical device lawsuits as a cost of doing business, and will continue to market a faulty or dangerous device as a long as it garners a profit. Through aggressive litigation, medical device lawyers exert pressure on companies to remove flawed products from the market. This page continues links to medical device lawsuit news updates for a number of dangerous products.
Hospitals across America go to great lengths to offer da Vinci robot surgery even though no definitive study has emerged proving this method is better than ordinary laparoscopy. In fact, some surgeons suggest that surgery using the da Vinci surgical robot poses greater risks to patients than traditional laparoscopy, and can result in accidental cuts, ruptures and tears to internal tissues and organs. Marketing materials created and used by Intuitive Surgical, the company that developed the da Vinci surgery robot, make false or unproven claims regarding the tool's efficacy and superiority. Unaware of the potential risks and assuming that new technology indicates improved care, thousands of patients have unwittingly exposed themselves to internal damage from da Vinci robot surgery. This page provides da Vinci robot surgery lawsuit news updates from nation,pal da Vinci injury lawyers.
The Mirena IUD is a small medical device that is inserted into the uterus in order to prevent pregnancy. While the device is considered among the most effective forms of contraception on the U.S. market, the Mirena IUD has recently been linked to a host of significant side effects. More than 45,000 complaints have been filed with the FDA since 2006 in regards to Mirena IUD side effects, including perforation and embedment of the device through and in the tissues and organs of and near the uterus resulting in serious and permanent health problems. Bayer, the company that markets the product, has been issued multiple Mirena IUD FDA warnings. Persons or family members of persons who have experienced Mirena IUD side effects may be entitled to compensation, say Mirena IUD lawyers. Read for the most recent Mirena IUD lawsuit news.
Used transvaginally to remedy pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic mesh has been linked to a host of serious side effects. The surgical mesh has been found to migrate, erode and extrude, or push through, vaginal tissues, causing debilitating pain, infection, damage to organs, bleeding, urinary problems and recurrent prolapse. Some patients require multiple surgeries to remove shards of mesh and repair damage. Vaginal mesh FDA warnings were issued in both 2008 and 2011, warning consumers and medical professionals that severe pelvic mesh side effects are not uncommon. Vaginal mesh lawyers say persons and family members of persons who have suffered transvaginal mesh problems may be due compensation. For the latest pelvic mesh lawsuit news, read here.
The Rejuvenate and ABG II Modular-Neck Stem Hip Replacement Systems were recalled by Stryker Corporation in 2012 following reports of failure of the device. Specifically, The Stryker hip recall came after reports that the metal-on-metal Stryker hip replacement systems have been found to corrode and fret, resulting in severe and lasting pain, infection and swelling, as well as loosening and dislocation of the device. Individuals and family members of persons who experienced Stryker hip implant problems may be entitled to compensation for their suffering and losses, say Stryker hip recall lawyers. Read for the latest Stryker hip recall lawsuit news.